|
Post by V1 on Oct 28, 2005 23:06:57 GMT -5
I notice in the aging process, if someone is 30, and they look all youthful and stuff, and then when they get 50, you can see a signficant change in their appearance. They're much older, they're losing their hair (and/or it's graying) and some strenuous physical activities they can't do anymore. But if you compare this to a singer, their voice never changes. The late Luther Vandross is a perfect example. His voice never changed from the time he was 30 until the time he died. His voice could hit the same notes, he could bring it low, steady, whatever. So I just wanted to point out that's one aspect that hardly ever changes in aging, the voice.
|
|
|
Post by Maka on Jan 1, 2006 16:45:05 GMT -5
That's true...the only bad thing is that today...female artist have to have sex appeal normally...and when they get old, they lose that...
|
|
|
Post by Sniper2x on Jan 2, 2006 20:50:47 GMT -5
hmm i just noticed...well i just havent thought about it
|
|
|
Post by V1 on Jan 3, 2006 23:24:00 GMT -5
Not Janet Jackson...
|
|
|
Post by batman911uk on Jan 5, 2006 6:41:17 GMT -5
iunno about that v
some people's voice doesnt change but for the majority it does alter as they grow older, it might still be a superb voice, but its not the same
|
|
|
Post by X Man on Jul 2, 2006 23:33:40 GMT -5
True to that Bat Boy. The voice does change, but it's little subtle changes, not huge drastic ones.
|
|
|
Post by V1 on Jul 2, 2006 23:47:33 GMT -5
Well, then the voice's age is not proportional to the face then.
|
|
|
Post by X Man on Jul 3, 2006 22:07:43 GMT -5
Exactly on the spot there, Vern.[/color
|
|
|
Post by batman911uk on Jul 4, 2006 7:26:10 GMT -5
] you forgot the ]
|
|